Biojournal of Science and Technology

A Scholarly Journal for Biological Publications

Biojournal of Science and Technology
Volume 3, P-ISSN:2412-5377, E-ISSN:2410-9754, Article ID:m150006

Research Article

Development of a modified Britton-Robinson buffer with improved linearity in the alkaline pH region

Akio Ebihara1, Shuhei Kawamoto2, Naoya Shibata2, Takashi Yamaguchi2, Fumiaki Suzuki1, Tsutomu Nakagawa1, *

1Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1193, Japan

2Graduate School of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1193, Japan

Date of Acceptance: Thursday, February 4, 2016
Date of Published: Saturday, February 20, 2016

Address corresponds to
Tsutomu Nakagawa
Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1193, Japan.
Email: nakagawa@gifu-u.ac.jp

Acedemic Editor: Editor-in-Chief

Article Tags
Universal buffer, Britton-Robinson buffer, multi-buffer system, pH-dependence, renin

To cite this article
Akio Ebihara, Shuhei Kawamoto, Naoya Shibata, Takashi Yamaguchi, Fumiaki Suzuki, Tsutomu Nakagawa .Development of a modified Britton-Robinson buffer with improved linearity in the alkaline pH region.Biojournal of Science and Technology.Volume 3,2016

Download manuscript | Download Citation | Views: 9895

Share:

ABSTRACT

Britton-Robinson buffer is a multi-buffer system that consists of citric acid, phosphate, barbital, and boric acid. Although this buffer system is known to be effective from pH 2.6 to 12, the linearity of the alkaline region (pH 9–12) is poor. Searching for a weak acid additive to maintain the buffering capacity in the alkaline region, we found that glycine (pKa = 2.35 and 9.78) was effective in improving the linearity of the pH titration curve. The pH titration formula of the improved Britton-Robinson buffer is provided in this report. The pH-dependent activities of renin, a key enzyme that regulates blood pressure and electrolyte balance, were investigated using the improved buffer, and the results found were similar to those measured with the typical Britton-Robinson buffer.

INTRODUCTION

Proteins bear numerous functional groups that can undergo acid-base reactions (Voet and Voet 2004a). Because of the presence of pH-titratable groups, protein properties can change in a pH-dependent manner. For example, the initial rate of many enzymatic reactions exhibits a bell-shaped curve as a function of pH (Voet and Voet 2004b). This is a result of the effect of pH on several factors: the binding of substrates to the enzyme, the catalytic activity of the enzyme, and changes in protein structure (Voet and Voet 2004b); because of this, pH-dependent properties of proteins are measured in buffer solutions, which maintain pH of the solution within a small range.

A typical buffer is a solution of a weak acid and its conjugate base (Voet and Voet 2004a). The buffering capacity is effective only in the pH range of pKa ± 1 (Voet and Voet 2004a). To cover wide ranges of pH values, multi-buffer systems containing several weak acids in one solution are used (Johnson and Lindsey 1939, McIlvaine 1921, Newman 2004). Using multi-buffer systems, buffers may be prepared at a desired pH value without altering the chemical composition of the buffered component.

We have utilized the multi-buffer system known as the Britton-Robinson buffer, which is effective from pH 2.6 to 12 (Johnson and Lindsey 1939), to analyze the pH-dependent properties of enzymes (Ebihara et al. 2000, Iwata et al. 2007, Iwata et al. 2008, Nasir 1998). This buffer system contains four different buffering components: citric acid (pKa = 3.0, 4.6 and 5.8), phosphate (pKa = 6.9 and 11.6), barbital (pKa = 7.96), and boric acid (pKa = 9.2) (Johnson and Lindsey 1939). The respective pKa values ranging from 3.0 to 9.2 differ from one another by about 1.2 pKa units (Britton and Robinson 1931). However, the difference in pKa values between boric acid (pKa = 9.2) and phosphate (pKa = 11.6) is 2.4, leading to weak buffering capacity in the alkaline region (pH 9.2–11.6).

In this study, we searched for another weak acid to improve the buffering capacity in the alkaline region. For this purpose, we found that glycine (pKa = 2.35 and 9.78) is effective, and we have proposed a simple formula for the preparation of the improved Britton-Robinson buffer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

All buffer reagents were purchased from Nacalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan).

Searching an additive to improve an alkaline region

To prepare a typical Britton-Robinson buffer (citric acid/phosphate/barbital/boric acid system) (Johnson and Lindsey 1939), an acid mixture containing hydrochloric acid (38.1 mM, HCl), citric acid (38.1 mM), potassium dihydrogen phosphate (38.1 mM), barbital (38.1 mM), and boric acid (38.1 mM) was prepared (see below for more details). To search for another weak acid that maintains the buffering capacity in the alkaline region, glycine (pKa = 2.35 and 9.78), sodium bicarbonate (pKa = 3.80 and 10.38), and N-cyclohexyl-3-aminopropanesulfonic acid (pKa = 10.4, CAPS) were selected and added to separate acid mixtures at a final concentration of 38.1 mM. These new acid mixtures, as well as the typical Britton-Robinson acid mixture were aliquoted into 51 tubes with 150-µL volume. The aliquots were separately mixed with sodium hydroxide (50 µL, NaOH) solution, where a different volume of 1.0 M NaOH was added in increments of 1.0 µL. The pH values of the resulting solutions were measured at room temperature using a compact pH meter (model B-212, Horiba, Kyoto Japan).

Making a formula to prepare improved Britton-Robinson buffer

To prepare the new improved Britton-Robinson buffer containing glycine, citric acid monohydrate (0.801 g, Mw = 210.14), potassium dihydrogen phosphate (0.519 g, Mw = 136.09), barbital (0.702 g, Mw = 184.19), boric acid (0.236 g, Mw = 61.83), and glycine (0.286 g, Mw = 75.07) were dissolved in pure water (90 mL) using a heater equipped with a magnetic stirrer. After ensuring complete dissolution of the solids, an HCl solution (117.8 µL, Mw = 36.48; d = 1.18 g/mL) was added to this solution, which was then made up to 100 mL with pure water. To adjust the pH of the buffer to the desired value, 150-µL aliquots of the acid mixture (38.1 mM with respect each component) were titrated with NaOH solution (50 µL). The pH titration curve obtained in this study is represented by: pH = 0.1920 × VNaOH + 2.3813, where pH is the desired pH value of the titrated solution, and VNaOH is the volume of 1.0 M NaOH. Based on this equation, VNaOH (µL) as well as the remaining volume [50 VNaOH (µL)] of pure water were determined to prepare a buffer with the desired pH value. The pH value of titrated solution was measured at room temperature using a compact pH meter. The acid mixture and the titrated solutions were stored at room temperature in the dark before use.

Examining pH-dependent properties using the improved Britton-Robinson buffer

To examine the pH-dependence of enzymatic activity, recombinant human renin (25 pM) was incubated with recombinant ovine angiotensinogen (0.5 µM, oANG) at 37 °C for 30 min at various pH values, ranging from pH 3.5 to 10.0, using the improved Britton-Robinson buffer. In addition, the buffer contained diisopropyl fluorophosphate (8 mM), EDTA (8 mM), NaCl (100 mM), and 0.1% (w/v) heat-denatured bovine serum albumin (fraction V). The concentration of each buffering component (citric acid/phosphate/barbital/boric acid/glycine system) was 20 mM. Recombinant human renin and oANG were prepared as described previously (Ebihara et al. 2000, Nagase et al. 1997, Nasir 1998). The rate of angiotensin-I generation was determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Suzuki et al. 1990).

RESULTS

Improvement of the Britton-Robinson buffer containing a weak acid additive

To improve the buffering capacity of Britton-Robinson buffer in the alkaline region (pH 9.2 –11.6), we prepared three kinds of Britton-Robinson buffer containing either glycine (pKa = 2.35 and 9.78), CAPS (pKa = 10.4), or sodium bicarbonate (pKa = 3.80 and 10.38). When the acid mixture was titrated with NaOH, the pH of the titrated solution was approximately proportional to the volume of NaOH (Figure 1A), which is consistent with previous observations (Britton and Robinson 1931). Compared to the standard Britton-Robinson buffer, the buffers containing either glycine or CAPS exhibited better linearity in the alkaline region (Figure 1B). In contrast, the linearity of the buffer containing sodium bicarbonate was worse above pH 9 (Figure 1A). Based on the titration data (Figure 1A), we performed a linear regression analysis to derive a pH titration equation (Table 1). Compared with the typical Britton-Robinson buffer, the buffer containing either glycine or CAPS as the additive allowed a wider pH-buffering range with good linearity (R2 = 0.999). This result indicates that each of these additives is effective in improving the buffering capacity in the alkaline region (pH 9 to 12). Because glycine is cheaper than CAPS, we used glycine as the weak acid additive to test the buffer solution.

To examine if the pH titration equation is repeatable, we prepared buffer solutions adjusted from pH 4.0 to 11.0 with increments of 0.5 pH unit (Table 2) using the equation. The actual pH values of the resulting buffers were plotted against the volume of 1.0 M NaOH added to achieve the desired pH (Figure 2). The plotted data align well along the pH titration equation (Figure 2), indicating that the derived pH titration equation can be used for the improved Britton-Robinson buffer. Furthermore, the pH values of the prepared buffers remained constant for 50 days (Supplementary Figure1). When diluted to 70% with 10 mM phosphate buffer, most of the diluted solutions had pH values within 0.1 pH unit of the original pH value (Supplementary Table 1).

Figure 1. Examining a weak acid to improve the buffering capacity in the alkaline region of Britton-Robinson buffer.

(A) Comparison of pH titration curve. Fifty-one aliquots containing 150 µL acid mixture were separately mixed with 50 µL NaOH solution containing a different amount of 1.0 M NaOH. In addition to a typical acid mixture (blue), acid mixtures containing either glycine (black), CAPS (red), or sodium bicarbonate (magenta) as weak acid additives were prepared to examine their buffering capacities.

(B) An enlarged figure of panel A.

 

Table 1. Effect of an additive on the pH-titration of Britton-Robinson buffer

Additive

pH titration equation

R2 value

pH range with a good linearity

None

pH = 0.1968 × VNaOH + 2.1006

0.9992

2.3–9.2

Glycine

pH = 0.1920 × VNaOH + 2.3813

0.9992

2.5–11.8

CAPS

pH = 0.2056 × VNaOH + 2.1193

0.9992

2.3–11.3

Sodium bicarbonate

pH = 0.2130 × VNaOH + 3.3010

0.9992

3.2–8.4

The pH titration equation as well as its R2 value was obtained using linear regression in Microsoft Excel.

 

Examining pH-dependent properties of protein

Using the improved Britton-Robinson buffer, we reexamined the pH-dependency of renin, a key enzyme that regulates blood pressure and electrolyte balance (Campbell 2003, Nabi et al. 2013, Voet and Voet 2004b). The pH-dependency measured with the improved buffer was similar to that measured using the standard Britton-Robinson buffer (Figure 3). This result indicates that the improved buffer is compatible with the standard buffer and can be used to study pH-dependent protein properties.

Table 2. Formula to prepare the improved Britton-Robinson buffer (pH 4.0–11.0)

pH

Acid mixture a

(µL)

1.0 M NaOHb

(µL)

Pure water c

(µL)

pH measured d

4.0

150

8.4

41.6

4.3

4.5

150

11.0

39.0

4.5

5.0

150

13.6

36.4

5.1

5.5

150

16.3

33.7

5.5

6.0

150

18.9

31.1

6.1

6.5

150

21.5

28.5

6.5

7.0

150

24.1

25.9

7.1

7.5

150

26.7

23.3

7.5

8.0

150

29.3

20.7

8.0

8.5

150

31.9

18.1

8.6

9.0

150

34.5

15.5

9.1

9.5

150

37.1

12.9

9.5

10.0

150

39.7

10.3

10.0

10.5

150

42.3

7.7

10.6

11.0

150

44.9

5.1

11.0

The buffer contained HCl, citric acid, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, barbital, boric acid, and glycine. a38.1mM each. bThe volume is defined as VNaOH (µL). cThe volume is equal to 50    VNaOH (µL). d28.6 mM each.

Figure 2. Confirmation of pH titration curve of the improved Britton-Robinson buffer developed in this study. A series of buffers between pH 4.0 and 11.0 were prepared according to the formula provided in Table 2. The pH values measured by a pH meter are shown in by triangles. The pH titration curve derived from Figure 1 (pH = 0.1920 × VNaOH + 2.3813) is shown in this figure.

Figure 3. pH-dependence of human renin with oANG analyzed using the improved Britton-Robinson buffer. The pH-dependent activities of reaction of human renin with oANG were measured at 37 °C for 30 min at various pH values from pH 3.5 to 10.0. Filled triangles indicate activities measured using improved Britton-Robinson buffer developed in this study. Activities measured using a standard Britton-Robinson buffer (Ebihara et al. 2000) are shown in by open circles.

DISCUSSION

Multi-buffer systems contains several buffering components (Newman 2004). These buffer systems allow the pH of a buffer solution to be maintained without changing the chemical composition (Newman 2004). In this study, we improved the buffering capacity of the multi-acid Britton-Robinson buffer in the alkaline region.

We found that glycine was an effective additive, improving the buffer performance in the alkaline region (Figure 1A). The glycine-added Britton-Robinson buffer had good linearity over a wide pH range (pH 2.5–11.8) (Table 1). As shown in Figure 2, the pH values of improved Britton-Robinson buffer that was prepared according to the preparation formula (Table 2) were in good agreement with the pH values predicted by the pH titration equation.

Because the pH titration equation was found to be repeatable (Figure 2), it can be used to prepare the improved Britton-Robinson buffer. Depending on the quality of reagents available, the pH titration equation can be shifted about 0.1 pH unit from our equation. Generally, several experimental plots at pH 4.0, 7.0, and 10.0 should be made to generate new pH titration equations tailored to available reagents. The preparation formula proposed in this study will prove useful for studies on pH-dependent properties of proteins.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank all the laboratory members who have contributed to the improvement of Britton-Robinson buffer. This work was supported in part by the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Nos. 24658092 and 15K01707).

REFERENCES

  1. Britton HTS, Robinson RA. Universal buffer solutions and the dissociation constant of veronal. J. Chem. Soc. (Resumed). 1931, 1456–1462.
  2. Campbell DJ. The renin-angiotensin and the kallikrein-kinin systems. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2003, 35: 784–791.
  3. Ebihara A, Kondou T, Mizuno S, Nakagawa T, Nasir UM, Inui Y, Fukamizu A, Suzuki F, Nakamura Y, Murakami K. Molecular properties of recombinant ovine angiotensinogen. Biomedical Research-Tokyo. 2000, 21: 247–254.
  4. Iwata H, Nakagawa T, Nishiuchi K, Hiratsuka T, Satou R, Yoshioka Y, Fukui Y, Suzuki F, Nakamura Y. Ser84 of human renin contributes to the biphasic pH dependence of the renin-angiotensinogen reaction. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2007, 71: 1279–1285.
  5. Iwata H, Nakagawa T, Yoshioka Y, Kagei K, Imada K, Nakane C, Fujita H, Suzuki F, Nakamura Y. The coexistence of Ser84 in renin and His13 in angiotensinogen brings a pH profile of two separate peaks to the reaction of human renin and sheep angiotensinogen. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008, 72: 179–185.
  6. Johnson WC, Lindsey AJ. An improved universal buffer. Analyst. 1939. 64: 490–492.
  7. McIlvaine TC. A buffer solution for colorimetric comparison. J. Biol. Chem. 1921, 49: 183–186.
  8. Nabi AHMN, Suzuki F, Inagami K. Renin. in Rawlings ND, Salvesen GS, eds. Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes, vol. 1 Academic Press, Oxford. 2013. 71–82
  9. Nagase M, Suzuki F, Sawai Y, Orihashi T, Inui Y, Nakagawa T, Nakamura Y. Purification and some properties of recombinant sheep angiotensinogen expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biomedical Research-Tokyo. 1997, 18: 439–443.
  10. Nasir UM, Takahashi, K., Nagai, T., Nakagawa, T., Suzuki, F., Nakamura, Y. Two peaks in pH dependence of renin-angiotensinogen reaction. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1998, 62: 338–340.
  11. Newman J Novel buffer systems for macromolecular crystallization. Acta. Cryst. D. 2004, 60: 610–612.
  12. Suzuki F, Yamashita S, Takahashi A, Ito M, Miyazaki S, Nagata Y, Nakamura Y. Highly sensitive microplate-ELISA for angiotensin I using 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine. Clin. Exp. Hyper. 1990, A12: 83–95.
  13. Voet D, Voet JG. Aqueous Solutions. Biochemistry. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2004, 39–50.
  14. Voet D, Voet JG. Rates of Enzymatic Reactions. Biochemistry. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2004, 472–495.
  15. Voet D, Voet JG. Enzymatic Catalysis. Biochemistry. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2004, 496–546.

 

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES & TABLES

Supplementary Figure 1. pH values of the improved Britton-Robinson buffer stored for 50 days. The improved Britton-Robinson buffers adjusted from pH 4.0 to 11.0 were stored at room temperature in the dark for 50 days. Using a compact pH meter, the pH values of the buffers were measured over the storage period.

Supplementary Table 1. Effect of dilution on the pH value of improved Britton-Robinson buffer

1.0 M NaOH a

(µL)

100:0 b

70:30 c

50:50 d

 

1.0 M NaOH a

(µL)

100:0 b

70:30 c

50:50 d

0

2.5

2.6

2.8

 

26

7.5

7.5

7.5

1

2.6

2.7

2.9

 

27

7.7

7.6

7.6

2

2.8

2.9

3.1

 

28

7.9

7.9

7.8

3

2.9

3.0

3.2

 

29

8.1

8.0

8.0

4

3.1

3.2

3.4

 

30

8.2

8.2

8.2

5

3.3

3.4

3.6

 

31

8.4

8.3

8.3

6

3.5

3.6

3.7

 

32

8.7

8.6

8.6

7

3.6

3.7

3.9

 

33

8.9

8.8

8.7

8

3.8

3.9

4.1

 

34

9.1

9.0

8.9

9

4.0

4.1

4.3

 

35

9.2

9.2

9.1

10

4.2

4.3

4.5

 

36

9.4

9.3

9.2

11

4.4

4.5

4.8

 

37

9.5

9.4

9.3

12

4.6

4.7

5.0

 

38

9.6

9.6

9.5

13

4.8

4.9

5.2

 

39

9.8

9.8

9.6

14

5.0

5.2

5.4

 

40

10.0

9.9

9.8

15

5.2

5.4

5.6

 

41

10.2

10.1

10.0

16

5.4

5.5

5.8

 

42

10.4

10.3

10.2

17

5.7

5.8

6.0

 

43

10.6

10.6

10.3

18

5.9

6.0

6.1

 

44

10.8

10.7

10.6

19

6.1

6.2

6.3

 

45

11.1

11.0

10.7

20

6.3

6.3

6.5

 

46

11.2

11.1

10.9

21

6.4

6.5

6.7

 

47

11.4

11.3

11.1

22

6.6

6.7

6.8

 

48

11.6

11.5

11.3

23

6.8

6.8

6.9

 

49

11.7

11.5

11.4

24

7.0

7.0

7.1

 

50

11.8

11.6

11.5

25

7.2

7.3

7.2

         

The buffer contained HCl, citric acid, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, barbital, boric acid, and glycine. The buffer solution was diluted with sodium phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.2) containing NaCl (100 mM) and 0.1% (w/v) heat-denatured bovine serum albumin (fraction V). aThe volume is defined as VNaOH (µL). b28.6 mM each (28.6 mM buffer:phosphate buffer = 100:0). c20.0 mM each (28.6 mM buffer:phosphate buffer = 70:30). d14.3 mM each (28.6 mM buffer:phosphate buffer = 50:50).